Climate change represents one of the most pressing and escalating challenges of the 21st century, with far-reaching implications for the hydrological cycle, water security, and sustainable development at local, national, and global scales. Rising global temperatures, increased variability in precipitation patterns, declining renewable freshwater resources, rapid glacial melt, and the growing frequency of extreme events such as droughts and floods all highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of the climate crisis in the water sector [1].
According to the World Meteorological Organization’s 2023 report, surface water flows in over 60 % of monitored stations worldwide were recorded below the long-term average, while many reservoirs and aquifers are currently in a critical condition [2]. These alarming trends underscore the urgent need to strengthen the resilience of water resources, which has emerged as a key concept in contemporary natural resource policy and planning.
Water resilience refers to the capacity of hydrological and social systems to adapt to, respond to, and recover from climate-induced shocks without undergoing systemic collapse or incurring long-term damage. In recent years, this concept has gained significant traction in international water governance discourse and has become central to the frameworks of the United Nations, the World Bank, and various development agencies [3].
Despite its growing importance, a comprehensive understanding of global trends in water resilience, associated challenges, knowledge gaps, and successful policy responses remains underdeveloped in the scientific literature. Therefore, this article aims to conduct a systematic review of global studies and reports on the resilience of water resources in the context of climate change. By identifying pathways for transformation, prevalent analytical frameworks, assessment tools, and effective country-level experiences, this study seeks to lay the groundwork for future research and policy innovation in this critical domain.
Resilience is an interdisciplinary concept rooted in ecology and complex systems science, and it has increasingly been applied to the field of water resources management. In the context of water systems, resilience generally refers to the capacity of social-ecological systems to withstand climate-induced and anthropogenic shocks, as well as their ability to recover, adapt, or even transform in response to disturbances [4],[5]. This concept has emerged as a vital analytical tool for assessing the sustainability and robustness of water governance systems, especially as climate change increasingly alters the patterns of water availability, storage, and distribution.
The core dimensions of water resilience can be broadly categorized into three interrelated capacities: resistance to shocks, adaptability to new conditions, and transformability, or the ability to enact structural changes when existing systems become untenable. Within this framework, systems that are capable of learning, innovation, and stakeholder participation tend to demonstrate higher levels of long-term resilience [6]. These capacities are not static; rather, they evolve as systems interact with environmental pressures, institutional dynamics, and societal responses.
Recent research highlights the importance of integrating ecological, social, and institutional perspectives in the analysis of water resilience. For instance, the OECD’s 2021 resilience framework conceptualizes resilience as a continuous spectrum encompassing three levels: resisting stress, adapting to change, and undergoing structural transformation. This framework emphasizes not only the physical attributes of water systems but also institutional capacity, community engagement, and the efficacy of adaptation policies [7].
In this light, water resources resilience should be understood as a dynamic, multi-level, and systemic concept that requires integrated assessment tools and responsive policy approaches to effectively address the complex challenges posed by climate change. The following sections explore global trends, analytical frameworks, and practical experiences related to this emerging paradigm.
Over the past two decades, water resources resilience has emerged as a central theme in global water and environmental policy discourse. Global trends indicate that while countries face diverse and context-specific challenges in managing their water resources, many are also implementing innovative strategies to enhance resilience in the face of climate change and hydrological variability. Increasingly, water resilience is being recognized as a core objective within numerous international agendas, including the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
Among the most influential drivers shaping water resilience globally is climate change. Projections suggest that by 2050, more than half of the world’s population will reside in water-scarce or water-stressed regions [8]. Rising temperatures, shifting precipitation patterns, and the increasing frequency and intensity of extreme events such as droughts and floods represent severe threats to global water systems. For example, in arid and semi-arid regions, reduced rainfall and prolonged drought periods are expected to significantly diminish water reserves and impact agricultural productivity.
Global hydrological models further indicate that South Asia and North Africa will be particularly vulnerable to worsening water scarcity and the intensification of water-related crises. These projected changes are expected to lead to substantial declines in access to potable and agricultural water resources, compelling many nations to reassess and redesign their water management strategies.
Another critical global trend affecting water resilience is population growth. According to United Nations forecasts, the global population is expected to exceed 9 billion by 2050, placing unprecedented pressure on already stressed water resources. This is especially pronounced in developing countries, where population growth is driving increased demand for water in drinking, agriculture, and industrial sectors [9]. In densely populated urban areas, the strain on water systems is compounded by inadequate infrastructure, leading to heightened risks of water scarcity and deteriorating water quality.
These challenges are particularly acute in Asia and Africa, where infrastructure deficiencies and limited institutional capacities further complicate water resource governance [10]. In such contexts, building resilient water systems requires not only technical innovation but also inclusive policies, robust institutional frameworks, and cross-sectoral cooperation to adapt to the rapidly evolving climate and socio-economic conditions.
In response to climate change and other natural threats, many developed and developing countries have implemented a range of strategies to strengthen the resilience of water resources at the global level. One of the most prominent approaches is the adoption and implementation of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM)—a strategy strongly emphasized in the programs of international institutions such as the United Nations and the World Bank. IWRM seeks to enhance resilience by coordinating the management of water, land, and related resources to maximize economic and social welfare without compromising the sustainability of vital ecosystems [11]. This approach promotes more efficient, equitable, and sustainable use of water through cross-sectoral integration and stakeholder engagement.
In addition, a growing number of countries have introduced innovative policies and technological solutions to address water-related crises and the impacts of climate change. These include the deployment of advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence (AI) for predicting water availability and optimizing resource allocation, as well as the development of early warning systems aimed at reducing the risks associated with floods and droughts.
For example, in several African nations—such as Kenya and Ethiopia—advanced early warning systems have been implemented to support drought preparedness and improve water resource management under uncertain climate conditions [12]. These systems play a critical role in providing timely data and forecasts that enable decision-makers to take proactive measures, reducing the social and economic impacts of extreme events.
Overall, the integration of technological innovation, governance reform, and community-based adaptation into water management strategies reflects a global shift toward more resilient and adaptive water systems. These policy frameworks not only aim to mitigate the adverse impacts of climate variability but also to ensure long-term water security and sustainability.
Assessing the resilience of water resources is essential for evaluating and understanding the capacity of water systems to cope with climatic and environmental challenges. In recent decades, a variety of methodological approaches have been developed to assess water resilience at national, regional, and local levels. These approaches are typically based on key criteria such as adaptive capacity, crisis response readiness, and the ability to undergo structural transformation in the face of long-term stressors [13].
This section highlights some of the most widely used frameworks and tools for evaluating water resilience. These tools serve not only to measure resilience levels but also to inform decision-making, prioritize investments, and design adaptive management strategies. They often incorporate quantitative indicators, qualitative assessments, and multi-criteria analysis, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of system vulnerabilities and capacities across ecological, social, and institutional dimensions.
By applying such tools, policymakers and practitioners can identify weaknesses in existing water systems, monitor progress toward resilience goals, and develop context-specific responses that are both proactive and flexible. The following subsections will explore selected approaches and their application in different geographical and institutional settings.
One of the prominent approaches to resilience assessment involves the integration of socio-ecological criteria to evaluate the resilience of water systems. This method extends beyond physical indicators—such as water storage levels, precipitation rates, and drought frequency—to include social and institutional dimensions that influence adaptive capacity. For example, the ability of local communities to manage water resources, the extent of international cooperation, and the presence of climate adaptation policies are all critical factors in assessing overall resilience [14].
In this framework, resilience is not viewed solely through an ecological or biophysical lens, but also incorporates the social, economic, and governance structures that mediate human-environment interactions. One of the most widely recognized tools in this domain is the Social-Ecological Systems (SES) Resilience Framework, which has been developed to evaluate how communities respond to environmental shocks and long-term stressors.
The SES framework emphasizes the capacity of societies to utilize water resources sustainably, adapt to climate variability, and recover or reorganize ecological systems following disturbances [15]. It facilitates a holistic understanding of resilience by accounting for feedback loops, learning processes, and multi-level governance, making it particularly valuable in complex and dynamic water governance contexts (Figure 1).
By combining ecological integrity with social adaptability and institutional strength, this approach enables a more nuanced and comprehensive assessment of resilience, especially in areas vulnerable to both climatic and socio-political pressures.
Ostrom's Social-Ecological Resilience Framework [16]
Water resource resilience is an inherently multidimensional concept that cannot be adequately evaluated without a comprehensive examination of its physical, social, economic, and institutional components. To effectively measure the capacity of water systems to withstand, adapt to, and recover from adverse conditions, it is essential to utilize well-defined, credible, and context-sensitive indicators.
These indicators serve as crucial analytical tools that allow for a more accurate and evidence-based assessment of existing vulnerabilities, response capacities, and adaptive mechanisms. Moreover, they provide structured insights for identifying weaknesses, tracking progress, and guiding informed decision-making at local, national, and international levels [13].
The use of resilience indicators has become increasingly common in academic and policy circles, where they help bridge the gap between theoretical frameworks and practical water governance. In the scientific literature, a variety of specialized indicators have been proposed for evaluating water resilience. Among them, three key indicators have emerged as particularly prominent and widely applied due to their relevance, adaptability, and methodological robustness.
The next section will present and elaborate on these three leading indicators, which collectively offer a multi-angle lens for assessing the resilience of water systems under changing environmental and climatic conditions.
The Adaptive Capacity Index reflects the ability of water systems and their associated management frameworks to adjust to environmental, social, and economic changes. This indicator captures the systemic potential to respond proactively to dynamic conditions and uncertainties, rather than merely reacting to them.
Adaptive capacity is shaped by a wide range of interrelated factors, including the level of technical expertise, institutional flexibility, access to financial resources, and the effectiveness of participatory decision-making mechanisms. High adaptive capacity enables systems not only to minimize vulnerability and reduce risk, but also to identify and seize opportunities that may emerge from change, thereby contributing to long-term sustainable development [17].
In the context of water governance, this index plays a foundational role in shaping strategies and policy interventions aimed at addressing water-related crises, climate change impacts, and structural governance challenges. It offers valuable insights into how resilient a system is in adapting to new stressors and how well it can support transformation processes without incurring irreversible damage or systemic failure.
The Hydrological Resilience Index evaluates the ability of a natural or managed water system to maintain its essential functions despite fluctuations in water availability. This indicator is particularly critical in arid and semi-arid regions, where water scarcity and variability pose severe challenges to both ecosystems and human livelihoods.
The components of this index are typically based on key hydrological parameters such as precipitation levels, evapotranspiration rates, groundwater fluctuations, surface flow variability, and the spatiotemporal distribution of water access [18]. By systematically analyzing these variables, the index provides a comprehensive understanding of the system’s capacity to buffer against hydrological stresses and maintain water supply stability.
Such analyses are instrumental in identifying critical hotspots of vulnerability, enabling policymakers and water managers to prioritize adaptive interventions tailored to local environmental conditions. Ultimately, the Hydrological Resilience Index serves as a vital tool for supporting sustainable water management strategies, especially in regions facing intensified water stress due to climate change and human activities.
The Economic Resilience Index refers to the capacity of social and economic systems to maintain and enhance productivity from water resources under conditions of crisis and instability. This indicator encompasses diverse dimensions such as the ability to manage water demand across agricultural, industrial, and domestic sectors, the resilience of local markets to water-related shocks, and the accessibility of investments and efficient infrastructure.
In countries with a high dependence on agricultural economies, this index holds particular significance, as disruptions in water availability can directly impact livelihoods, employment, and food security [19]. Furthermore, analyzing economic resilience provides deeper insights into a community’s ability to absorb shocks caused by water crises and to return to equilibrium, thereby supporting sustainable economic continuity.
Overall, the integrated use of this index alongside other resilience indicators offers a multilayered and comprehensive picture of water resource resilience across different scales. This holistic assessment forms a scientifically grounded basis for the development of effective adaptation plans, risk reduction strategies, and improved water governance frameworks.
Modeling stands out as a critical tool in the assessment of water resource resilience. Through the use of advanced hydrological and climate models, it becomes possible to systematically evaluate how water systems respond to various environmental and climatic changes. Simulation models that project climate variability and assess its impacts on water resources play a particularly important role in forecasting water crises such as droughts and floods [20].
These models are especially valuable for simulating diverse climate change scenarios and supporting future water resource management planning. By providing detailed insights into potential stressors and vulnerabilities, they enable proactive adaptation strategies to be developed well in advance.
In addition to physical and climate modeling, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models have emerged as effective tools for evaluating resilience. These models integrate multiple criteria—such as adaptive capacity, water availability, and system responsiveness to crises—to assist policymakers in making more informed and optimized decisions aimed at strengthening water resource resilience [21].
Collectively, the combination of hydrological simulations and decision-support tools forms a powerful framework for designing resilient water management policies capable of withstanding the growing uncertainties posed by climate change and socio-economic pressures.
Advanced technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), remote sensing, and big data analytics play a pivotal role in enhancing the accuracy, speed, and efficiency of water resilience assessment processes. These technologies provide intelligent platforms for the collection, analysis, and interpretation of environmental data, enabling timely and evidence-based decision-making by water resource managers and policymakers [22].
AI, particularly through machine learning algorithms and neural networks, excels at analyzing complex datasets and uncovering hidden patterns within vast hydrological and climatic data repositories. This capability significantly supports the modeling of water resource behavior under various scenarios, including climate change impacts, droughts, human exploitation, and environmental pollution [23]. The IoT enables real-time data acquisition by connecting environmental monitoring devices to communication networks. Sensors installed in surface and groundwater sources can continuously record key indicators such as water level, temperature, pH, electrical conductivity, dissolved oxygen, and the presence of heavy metals, transmitting this data to central databases [24]. These real-time datasets are crucial for continuous resilience monitoring, early detection of abrupt changes, and identification of critical hotspots within water systems.
Furthermore, integrating remote sensing data—such as satellite imagery—with AI analytical models allows for the large-scale monitoring of vegetation cover changes, evapotranspiration rates, soil moisture variations, and groundwater level fluctuations [25],[26]. This integrated approach is especially valuable in regions where ground-based data collection is limited, providing a comprehensive picture of water resource conditions and resilience capacity. Big data analytics represents another critical tool in this framework. The vast volumes of data generated from multiple sources—including sensors, satellites, meteorological stations, social networks, and historical water use records—when properly analyzed, can reveal underlying patterns and early warning signs of emerging water crises [27]. Additionally, Smart Decision Support Systems (Smart DSS)—which integrate all the aforementioned technologies—offer a unified analytical platform for resilience evaluation. These systems empower managers to simulate various management scenarios and select optimal strategies based on real-time data analysis and predictive modeling [28].
Overall, these cutting-edge technologies not only enhance the capacity to assess water resource resilience but also pave the way for adaptive, predictive, and intelligent water management. Integrating such technologies into water policy frameworks can sustainably strengthen the resilience of water systems against climate risks, human pressures, and natural disasters.
Although many countries and international organizations are striving to enhance the resilience of water resources against climate change and other threats, numerous challenges and gaps remain that require urgent attention to advance global objectives in this field. These challenges encompass a wide range of technical, managerial, social, economic, and institutional issues, manifesting at national, regional, and global levels.
One of the primary obstacles is the lack of coordination between national and international policies. While some countries have developed national strategies to address water crises, these policies often face implementation challenges, managerial inefficiencies, and sometimes intersectoral conflicts. For instance, inconsistencies between water, environmental, and agricultural policies hinder the effective execution of resilience programs [29]. At the international level, agreements and regional collaborations—particularly concerning shared water resources—have yet to reach a level capable of ensuring coordinated and sustainable management.
Additionally, the shortage of financial resources poses a significant limitation. In many developing countries, especially across Asia and Africa, there is insufficient funding to invest in resilience-enhancing projects such as upgrading water infrastructure or adopting advanced technologies. Financial constraints can obstruct the implementation of climate adaptation projects and investments in education and public awareness programs.
Social and cultural factors also play a crucial role in the success or failure of resilience policies. In many communities, particularly rural areas, a lack of awareness about the risks posed by climate change and water-related hazards creates barriers to the adoption of new technologies and the modification of traditional consumption and resource management patterns. Under such circumstances, even the well-designed policies may fail due to insufficient public participation and engagement [30].
Moreover, rapid climate changes and uncertainties in forecasting further complicate long-term water resource management planning. Despite technical advancements, predictive models sometimes fall short of accurately representing real-world conditions. This limitation can lead to the formulation of strategies that are ineffective or misaligned with actual circumstances [31].
Finally, one of the most critical weaknesses lies in the lack of precise data and effective monitoring systems. In many countries, particularly less developed regions, data on water resource status, climatic variables, and socio-economic indicators are either incomplete or entirely absent. The absence of reliable data severely hampers evidence-based decision-making and can significantly disrupt efforts to strengthen resilience [32].
An analysis of global trends in water resource resilience against climate change reveals that resilience to water-related crises, especially amid climate shifts and population growth, has become a major global challenge. These challenges are widely observed across all continents, compelling governments, international organizations, and local communities to collaborate synergistically in search of sustainable and effective solutions. In response, many countries and global organizations have adopted approaches such as integrated water resource management policies, enhanced international cooperation, and the application of advanced technologies to strengthen resilience against climate impacts.
A key insight emerging from these global trends is the increasing emphasis on simultaneously addressing social, economic, and environmental factors. This highlights that focusing solely on technical and scientific dimensions is insufficient to fully meet societal needs and improve resilience. Instead, special attention must be paid to enhancing public awareness, modifying social behaviors, developing financial policies, and reinforcing international partnerships. In this context, analyzing social and cultural challenges, especially within developing communities, is critical to prevent the rejection of new policies and technologies in the water sector.
Another significant challenge discussed in this research is the lack of coordination between national and international water policies. Many countries develop independent water policies, which can result in contradictory and ineffective implementation. Studies show that developing countries face particularly severe challenges in this regard, as they often suffer from limited financial resources and weaker infrastructure for implementing comprehensive policies. These deficiencies can slow down the process of strengthening water resilience and hinder the achievement of global goals.
Moreover, inaccurate climate projections and the absence of reliable data constitute major obstacles to effective water resilience planning. Such inaccuracies may lead to flawed decision-making, ultimately imposing substantial costs on societies. Therefore, there is a clear need to improve climate forecasting models and establish precise monitoring systems that provide timely and accurate data.
Furthermore, despite considerable efforts to harness modern technologies, many countries—especially those in less developed regions—struggle to secure the financial means necessary to implement resilience-related projects. In these areas, limited access to advanced technologies and a shortage of skilled labor to deploy these technologies pose serious challenges to resilience efforts. This issue is particularly pronounced in African and Asian countries, where economic and agricultural policies are closely linked to climate change threats and water scarcity. Addressing this situation requires an interdisciplinary approach tailored to the specific conditions of each region.
Based on the analyses conducted, it can be concluded that strengthening the resilience of water resources against climate change requires a comprehensive and multifaceted approach encompassing technical, scientific, social, economic, and environmental dimensions. Water resource management policies must be designed holistically to reduce the vulnerability of water systems to future crises. These policies need to be coordinated both at the national and international levels to ensure greater effectiveness.
A key prerequisite for success in this area is investing in water infrastructure and modern technologies. Developing accurate climate forecasting and monitoring systems can significantly reduce uncertainties and improve long-term planning efforts. Additionally, raising public awareness about water crises and climate change is essential so that local communities can effectively respond to water-related challenges.
Furthermore, to achieve sustainable water resilience, international cooperation and the exchange of experiences between countries are crucial. This is especially important in regions where geographic boundaries and water resources are shared. Transboundary collaborations in water management and crisis response can greatly contribute to enhancing global resilience. In this regard, international agreements and common legal frameworks for water resource management can create a supportive environment for cooperation and address challenges arising from climate change and water crises.
Ultimately, increasing the resilience of water resources to climate change demands an integrated approach that considers all managerial, technical, social, and economic aspects. Achieving this goal is only possible through sustained collaboration among governments, international organizations, non-governmental entities, and local communities. Therefore, it is imperative for policymakers and researchers in this field to continuously update their knowledge and monitor global developments in water resilience. Such efforts are vital for safeguarding water resources and strengthening their resilience for future generations.
- ,
“IPCC, 2023: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland,” ,Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Jul , 2023, https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 - , The World Bank Group A to Z 2016, 2016
- , “Building the resilience of WSS utilities to climate change and other threats: A road map (English)”, 2018
- ,
“How resilient are ecosystems to global environmental change?” ,Sustain Sci , Vol. 5 (2), :151-1542010, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-010-0109-x - ,
“Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems” ,Ecology and Society , Vol. 9 (2), 2004 - ,
“Adaptive and sustainable water management: from improved conceptual foundations to transformative change” ,International Journal of Water Resources Development , Vol. 36 (2–3), :397-4152020, https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1721268 - ,
“Just how resilient are OECD and EU countries” ,Bertelsmann Stiftung , 2021 - ,
“An enhanced model of land water and energy for global hydrologic and earth-system studies” ,Journal of Hydrometeorology , Vol. 15 ((5)), :1739-17612014 - , “Valuing water: rights, resilience, and the UN high-level panel on water”, In: Water Politics: Governance, Justice, and the Right to Water, 2019
- ,
“Physicochemical Parameters and Terroir Assessment of Mineral Water from Mount Smolikas in Greece: A Two-Year Study” ,Analytica , Vol. 4 (3), :280-2992023, https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica4030022 - ,
“Water governance, resilience and global environmental change – a reassessment of integrated water resources management (IWRM)” ,Water Science and Technology , Vol. 56 (4), :1-92007, https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.530 - ,
“Climatic and Hydrological Factors Affecting the Assessment of Flood Hazards and Resilience Using Modified UNDRR Indicators: Ayutthaya, Thailand” ,Water , Vol. 14 (10), 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/w14101603 - , “Scoring Water Stewardship at Academic Institutions: A Water Resources Management Scoring Framework for Future Sustainability, Resilience and Innovation”, MSc Dissertation, 2022
- ,
“Building resilience to promote sustainability” ,IHDP Update , Vol. 2 , :1-32003 - , “Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems”, in: Navigating Social-Ecological Systems, 2002
- ,
“A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems” ,Science , Vol. 325 (5939), :419-4222009, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133 - ,
“Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity” ,Global Environmental Change , Vol. 16 (3), :293-3032006, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004 - ,
“Integrating risks of climate change into water management” ,Hydrological Sciences Journal , Vol. 60 (1), :4-132015, https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.967250 - ,
“Unraveling the complexities of disaster management: A framework for critical social infrastructure to promote population health and resilience” ,Social Science & Medicine , Vol. 93 , :238-2462013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.07.040 - ,
“Uncertainty Analysis for a Social Vulnerability Index” ,Annals of the Association of American Geographers , Vol. 103 (3), :526-5432013, https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.700616 - ,
“Estimation of crop water requirements using remote sensing for operational water resources management,” ,Paphos, Cyprus, Jun , 2015, https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2192520 - ,
“A reference framework and overall planning of industrial artificial intelligence (I-AI) for new application scenarios” ,Int J Adv Manuf Technol , Vol. 101 (9–12), :2367-23892019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-018-3106-3 - ,
“Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review” ,Water , Vol. 10 (11), 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/w10111536 - ,
“Role of Internet of Things (IoT) in Adoption of Industry 4.0,” ,J. Ind. Intg. Mgmt. , Vol. 07 (04), :515-5332022, https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424862221500068 - ,
“Downscaling SMOS-Derived Soil Moisture Using MODIS Visible/Infrared Data” ,IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing , Vol. 49 (9), :3156-31662011, https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2120615 - ,
“Remote sensing-based biomass estimation of dry deciduous tropical forest using machine learning and ensemble analysis” ,Journal of Environmental Management , Vol. 308 , 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114639 - , “Leveraging big data to accelerate supply chain management in Covid-19”, In: The big data-driven digital economy: Artificial and computational intelligence, 2021
- ,
“Evaluation of Integrating SWAT Model into a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis towards Reliable Rainwater Harvesting Systems” ,Water , Vol. 13 (14), 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/w13141935 - ,
“Analyzing complex water governance regimes: the Management and Transition Framework” ,Environmental Science & Policy , Vol. 13 (7), :571-5812010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006 - ,
“The turbulent world of resilience: interpretations and themes for transdisciplinary dialogue” ,Climatic Change , Vol. 153 (1–2), :21-402019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-018-2358-0 - ,
“System resilience enhancement: Smart grid and beyond” ,Frontiers of Engineering Management , Vol. 4 (3), :271-2822017, https://doi.org/10.15302/J-FEM-2017030 - ,
“Climate resilience in marine protected areas and the ‘Protection Paradox’” ,Biological Conservation , Vol. 236 , :305-3142019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.005