Energy Renovation in Apartment Buildings Through Heat Recovery: A Comparative Case Study of HRV and EAHP
Abstract
Renovation measures aimed at recovering heat from exhaust air were assessed for their energy performance and economic feasibility in three Swedish apartment buildings. Case Building 1C‑HRV (Växjö) implemented a central heat recovery ventilation (C‑HRV) system, achieving the largest improvement: a 23% reduction in primary energy use (22 kWh/m²/year). Case Building 2DE‑HRV (Ljungby) installed decentralised HRV units (DE‑HRV), which increased energy consumption by 2 kWh/m²/year and incurred the highest annual service costs (SEK 14 000). Case Building 3EAHP (Växjö) integrated an exhaust air heat pump (EAHP) in one building, reducing primary energy use by 15% (12 kWh/m²/year) while supplying heat to three buildings on the premises. Despite the energy savings, none of the renovation measures were economically feasible under current conditions; the shortest payback period was 19 years for the EAHP. Future integration of smart controls and photovoltaic panels could improve economic viability, particularly for Case Building 3EAHP, where operational patterns favour complementary technologies