The proportion of renewable energy supply in the power system has increased significantly around the world to replace existing fossil fuel-based energy production and to reduce Carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. The total portfolio of Distributed Energy Resources (DER) including renewable energy sources is expected to surpass traditional forms of generation in 2018 [1]. Renewable Energy Sources (RES) have high output instability due to time and environmental influences, and it is difficult to predict the power generation output [2]. It is valuable to obtain the optimum capacity of renewable energy supply systems for specified load characteristics. It is necessary to study the optimum design conditions for facility capacity, including economic efficiency analysis based on energy production, initial investment cost and operating cost [3].
Several software tools are introduced and compared to analyze the electrical, economic and environmental performance of hybrid renewable energy systems in the reviews by Sinha and Chandel [4], and Connolly et al. [5]. Mendes et al. [6] and Markovic et al. [7] provide a survey of tools for efficient planning of Community Energy Systems (CES). Popular tools include TRNSYS and Hybrid Optimization of Multiple Energy Resources (HOMER). Numerous cases of studies of renewable energy system done with TRNSYS can be found. For example, De Luca et al. [8] studied a renewable energy system for a nearly zero greenhouse city in Italy, Venkataramani and Ramalingam [9] performed an analysis on the feasibility of compressed air. Behzadi and Niasati [10] compared the performance of a hybrid system of PV/FC/battery. Diverse topics are analyzed with HOMER worldwide. Examples include alternative energy scenarios in an island of Turkey by Kalinci [11], economic viability for PV/wind/diesel hybrid energy system in Malaysia by Ngan and Tan [12], techno-economic evaluation of various hybrid power systems for rural telecom by Amutha and Rajini [13] and change in electric energy cost by Demiroren and Yilmaz [14] in Turkey. Ghasemi et al. [15] and Asrari et al. [16] evaluated hybrid renewable energy systems for rural electrification of Iran, Sen and Bhattacharyya [17] studied off-grid electricity generation with renewable energy technologies in India. Ramli et al. [18] performed an economic analysis of PV/diesel hybrid system with flywheel energy storage and Ramli et al. [19] studied optimal sizing of grid-connected Photovoltaic (PV) energy system in Saudi Arabia. Shaahid et al. [20] reviewed the economic assessment of hybrid photovoltaic-diesel-battery power systems for residential loads in the same country. Similar research trends can be observed by the numerous authors in other countries such as: Kim et al. [21] of Korea, Bekele and Palm [22] of Ethiopia, Ma et al. [23] of China, Giannoulis and Haralambopoulos [24] of Greece, and Chmieland Bhattacharyya [25] of Scotland. Microgrid system is one of the popular arrangements that can be easily modeled by HOMER as seen in the studies by Hafez and Bhattacharya [26] and Abdilahi et al. [27]. Interesting studies such as a wind-to-hydrogen system for Arctic remote locations by Chade et al. [28] and wind-biogas hybrid energy production by Mudasser et al. [29] were reported.
Recently, intelligent management of power systems in conjunction with renewable energy penetration and user participation became one of the popular research topics. Pop et al. [30] investigated the use of decentralized blockchain mechanisms for delivering transparent timely energy flexibility, under the form of adaptation of energy demand profiles of Distributed Energy Prosumers. They found that blockchain based distributed demand side management can be used for matching energy demand and production at smart grid level. Brusco et al. [31] proposed a pair of laboratory prototypes of a low-cost energy box, suitable for cloud-based architectures for autonomous demand response of prosumers. They demonstrated through laboratory tests the feasibility of the proposed prototypes and their capability in executing thecustomers’ loads scheduling returned by the solution of the demand-response problem. Guerrero-Martinez et al. [32] presented a smart multiconverter system for residential/housing sector with a Hybrid Energy Storage System consisting of supercapacitor and battery, and with local PV energy source integration. The multiconverter is responsible for complying with the reference active power set-points with proper power quality guaranteeing that the local PV modules operate with a Maximum Power Point Tracking algorithm, and extending the lifetime of the battery. Croce et al. [33] proposed Overgrid, a fully distributed peer-to-peer architecture designed to automatically control and implement distributed demand response schemes in a community of smart buildings with energy generation and storage capabilities. Belong to a virtual microgrid, the Overgrid can apply some power balance criteria to its system of buildings regardless of their physical location. For intelligent load control for smart buildings, Ashabani and Gooi [34] designed a simple versatile real-time control and management strategy for provision of adaptive and intelligent demand response for buildings. Their three-phase multiobjective autonomous automated intelligent load control strategy offers superiorities in a computationally-efficient approach.
Most new investors wishing to install renewable energy facilities such as PV and wind power require accurate information to examine the business feasibility by making preliminary calculations of the investment scale and operating profit. When designing the capacity of renewable energy facilities, it is first necessary to predict the electric power production accurately through operation simulations that consider climate information. The results of the economic analysis are important information for ensuring the profitability of the electric power provider. To expand investment in renewable energy, a tool is needed to examine information about the size and type of investment, which should be easily accessible through the internet. The customers, government, and electric power supplier also need to analyse user requirements and manage information to improve future renewable energy power policy.
The objective of this study is to maximize the efficiency of energy demand and supply by optimizing the capacity of renewable energy sources that are suitable for the location of an investment area or workplace. For the long-term strategy, it will be necessary to analyse the factors affecting the stability and reliability of the system when a large capacity of renewable energy facilities is connected to the national grid, and plans should be prepared to solve any problems that may arise. The final goal of the research is to increase the independence of the national energy supply by securing linkage management technology for renewable energy resources and supporting long-term investment expansion policy. For this reason, new software for the economic evaluation of energy production, initial investment cost, and operation cost based on new renewable energy capacity was developed. It can help a customer service to find the optimum capacity of a renewable energy plant that best suits the given load characteristics in the Korean energy market. The software tool was developed by using Visual Basic (VBA) based on MS Office Excel and Access.
Figure 1 shows the main configuration and calculation procedure of the Korea Renewable Energy Project Optimization Program (KePOP©) program for the optimum design and economical evaluation of renewable energy facility capacity. To explore the optimal capacity design conditions and analyse the economic feasibility of the renewable energy facilities, the following steps were carried out:
Step 1: The annual energy consumption data is used to analyse the customer’s energy consumption characteristics, and the base load capacity for the initial investment is estimated from the Load Duration Curve (LDC);
Step 2: The type and capacity of the investment target facility are selected, and the initial investment cost is calculated:
Renewable energy generation from PV, Wind Turbines (WT);
Operating flexibility from a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS);
Active supply system using Fuel Cells (FC) or Diesel Engine Generators (DEG);
Step 3. Constraint data is set up, such as the fuel cost and trading price of renewable energy produced according to the domestic laws and regulations;
Step 4. Operating simulations for energy balancing calculation based on regional climate data and user energy load model based on consumption data;
Step 5. Annual production simulations are used to calculate total energy production from the selected facilities and estimate operating costs for energy supply and demand;
Step 6. Economic indicators are calculated, such as the Payback Period (PP), Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the initial investment cost through annual operating costs and trading profits;
Step 7. Sensitivity analysis according to device type and capacity change;
Step 8. Calculation of the optimal design conditions according to capacity constraints;
Step 9. Output of the calculation results of the optimal capacity.
Overview of optimum design and economic analysis program (KePOP)

To design and analyse an energy supply system that suits the demand, it is necessary to consider it as passive energy production and actively controlled energy production according to the energy production characteristics. The use of energy sources of adequate capacity to utilize renewable energy is important in securing economic efficiency. Therefore, the system should be designed so that the generated energy can be effectively utilized without waste. A passive energy source is, by nature, unilaterally supplied, such as solar and wind energy. Active energy sources include fuel cells and engine devices, which are capable of arbitrarily adjusting the timing of energy generation. When constructing a mixed renewable energy system composed of various energy sources, it is important to rationally combine a passive energy source and an active energy source to improve system efficiency and economic efficiency. The operational simulation with a basic strategy of pre-processing passive energy and injecting active energy according to the situation has been performed.
Figure 2 shows a flowchart of the program and the configuration of the graphical user interface. The first step is selecting the design target location, followed by inputting the user load value, device type, and capacity, and finally inputting values for the economic evaluation. After the operation simulation is executed, the amount of renewable energy production is calculated, and the shortfall in the required energy load consumption is calculated for when an active energy source is used or when purchasing it through an external power supply system.
Main graphical user interface of KePOP with a flowchart of the program

The operating simulation includes a series of processes for supplying the amount of energy required by the load through the prepared equipment. Through iterative calculations, the energy can be summed up at regular intervals to evaluate the performance and calculate the charge for energy trading volume. For example, consider a case of supplying energy with one type of solar power generation. When summing up the total amount of energy supplied for one month, there is a method of sequentially adding up the amount of generation according to time, but the result is the same, even if a distribution table for the amount of power generation for one month is made and added.
A statistical distribution table is made for one month or one year of source variables, such as solar radiation and wind speed. Calculations are performed in connection with the performance characteristics of specific equipment. This approach is appropriate because most renewable energy sources are affected by weather variables such as solar radiation and wind speed, which are represented by statistical variables. Table 1 compares the simulation and statistical analysis methods. Both methods were combined to develop the program to ensure speed and accuracy of the calculations.
Comparison of analysis methods
Type |
Simulation |
Statistical approach |
---|---|---|
Coverage |
Unlimited |
Single type or multiple models without mutual exchange |
Calculation speed |
Slow computation |
High speed |
Application example |
RETscreen[39], Homer[40], fChart[41], PV fChart[42], WindPower[43] |
|
Problem type |
Specific performance evaluation Detailed optimization |
Initial feasibility study Basic level optimization |
Configuration |
In-house development (Main-PG) |
External program (Sub-PG) |
To develop the analysis program for a renewable energy system, it is necessary to define the performance analysis theory for individual equipment in the system. The following are the basic concepts for the program from previous research and operation experience with various energy supply systems, including renewable energy.
The meteorological data are required for the analysis of the renewable energy equipment. There are 28 locations in the weather database developed by using weather information from 103 local stations provided by the Korea Meteorological Agency (KMA). The database includes latitude and longitude and 8,760 hours of temperature, solar radiation, dew point temperature, wind velocity, atmospheric pressure, and ground temperature. The weather data were prepared in a TMY2 file format, which is a standard format for renewable energy analysis. Figure 3 shows the air temperature, wind speed, solar radiation, and atmospheric pressure information for the 28 locations (Andong, Boseong, Busan, Cheongju, Chuncheon, Chupungnyeong, Daegu, Daejeon, Gangjin, Gangneung, Gimhae, Gwangju, Incheon, Jeju, Jinju, Mokpo, N. Changwon, Pohang, Seosan, Seoul, Uityeong, Wonju, Yangsan and Yeonggwang).
Specific weather data for 28 locations in Korea: ambient temperature (a); wind velocity (b); total radiation on horizontal (c) and atmospheric pressure (d)

For accurate modelling analysis of each component of the system, it is necessary to perform a component test through a standardized test procedure and find out the parameters necessary for mathematically describing the behavior. Most of these tests are conducted objectively by accredited laboratories, and the manufacturer provides the information to the customer. However, it is difficult to obtain such important data for products such as batteries and fuel cells because it is not sometimes disclosed. For a system that uses these components, a mathematical model is useful, and various scenarios are analyzed through simulation instead of carrying out an empirical test, which requires much effort and cost. The Component Test System Simulation (CTSS) method has been widely used in countries such as Germany, and the TRNSYS [30] program is widely used as an analysis tool in building energy analysis.
All information of the components that have undergone performance testing through market research was used. The operation simulation was performed for the case of configuring various system combinations using renewable energy facilities. Using the results of the operation simulation, an economic analysis is performed based on the investment cost and operating cost, and the objective function for optimizing the design capacity is calculated. The simplified mathematical definition of the analytical model for each facility is described below.
In the case of solar power generation from PV, the calculation result of energy production according to the input condition of each module is compared with the measured value obtained from the customer. The error of the predicted power generation was minimized by considering the effect of installation conditions such as PV farm location, inclination angle, and direction angle. PV power generation (PPV) and surface temperature (TC) can be calculated using simple eq. (1) and (2) [44], [45]:
where YPV is the rated capacity of the PV array, which is the power output under standard test conditions [kW], fPV is the PV derating factor [%], ḠT is the incident solar radiation on the PV array in the current time step [kW/m2], Ḡ T,STC is the incident radiation at standard test conditions [1 kW/m2], αP is the temperature coefficient of power [%/°C], and TC,STC is the PV cell temperature under standard test conditions [25 °C].
Various theoretical equations are known, such as the Betz theory [46], [47] using wind turbine performance curves and the Weibull distribution model [48] using mean values and standard deviations of wind speed. However, for practical use, the correlation between the wind speed U0 and the power generation PWT is mainly used based on actual measurements and is defined in eq. (3) [44]:
where AR is the area of the rotor, U0 is the free-stream velocity, and CP is the power coefficient for a wind turbine defined as a function of the axial induction factor 4a(1 − a)2. The CP values applicable for most wind turbine applications are associated with axial induction factors between 0 and 0.5. Values less than 0 are associated with propeller operation, and values above 1.0 are associated with propeller brakes. For wind turbines, values between 0.5 and 1.0 are not encountered in practice because in this region, stall-regulated turbines have lower tip-speed ratios and pitch-regulated wind turbines tend to have lower thrust coefficients. Pitching to the lower thrust coefficient achieves lower structural loads.
As with other renewable sources, it is necessary to correct the mismatch between the experimental conditions and the actual operating conditions in which the measurement data were obtained in the wind power calculation. The most important are the changes in air density and wind velocity according to height due to ground friction. Eq. (4) is used for calculating the density change according to the height of the wind turbine. Correlations based on boundary layer theory are widely used to consider vertical wind speed changes. Eq. (5) and eq. (6) show the power-law model and the log distribution equation, respectively:
where ρ2 is the air density at a given elevation (z), and B = 6.5 K/km of altitude.
Fuel cells and diesel engine generators can be interpreted in the same way as a cogeneration model in that they produce electricity and heat using fuel. The difference is that a fuel cell relies on an electrochemical method, while a diesel engine depends on combustion. In terms of electric energy generation and heat recovery, it is convenient to perform simulations using the macroscopic indexes of heat efficiency and heat recovery efficiency. These two devices are available in either electric or thermally driven operation as required. Sometimes, it is possible to reduce the fuel cost according to the operating mode by enabling partial load operation according to the power load. For partial load operation, it is necessary to calculate the necessary fuel cell power generation load according to each hourly power load and operate with an appropriate load ratio. The partial load operation analysis is constructed using the performance function for power generation efficiency, fuel consumption rate, and calorific power according to the partial load ratio [49]. Eq. (7) and eq. (8) show the partial load rate (X) and the fuel efficiency (ηfuel) as functions of the fuel consumption rate (V̇fuel):
where PDEG is the electrical power, PDEG, max is the maximum electrical power, ρfuel is fuel density, and LHVfuel is lower heating value of the fuel. In the case study of the fuel cell and diesel engine generator module, calculation was performed by selecting products that can secure product performance (power generation efficiency, array efficiency, fuel consumption efficiency, etc.).
The function of the energy storage system is becoming important as a countermeasure against the peak power load depending on the state of the power overload. In particular, a large-capacity battery energy storage device has advantages in that it can utilize wide energy flexibility through a function of charging surplus power and discharging it at a maximum peak load. The function of battery energy storage systems will increase steadily to maintain stable power system operation due to increases in instability and unpredictable renewable energy sources.
The battery analysis model uses the Shepherd (1965) and Hyman model (1977) [50], [51], which is based on the most traditional lead acid battery model. This model basically inputs the capacitance of the unit cell and the capacity according to the configuration of serial and parallel arrays. The relation between the charging rate of the battery, the operating current for charging or discharging, and voltage is calculated by solving a differential equation according to the characteristic curve given below for each time zone. Eq. (9) is the formula of the Shepherd and Hyman battery model:
where V is the voltage for charging or discharging, Q is capacity parameter, e is the open circuit voltage at full charge, g is the small-valued coefficients of State of Charge (SOC), r is the internal resistance at full charge when charging or discharging, and m is the cell type parameters. The subscript x indicates charging or discharging.
To analyse a lithium ion battery, which has recently been used in large-capacity systems, the dynamic voltage model by Tremblay [50] as in eq. (10) and the kinetic battery model [52], [53] used in HOMER as in eq. (11) to eq. (13) are adopted:
where V is the operating terminal voltage for charging or discharging and q is the current capacity rate for charge. The dynamic voltage model is a generic electrochemical model based on work by Jin et al. [54]. The model parameters are based on extracted parameters from battery datasheets. The kinetic battery model describes the interplay between bound and available capacity.
Figure 4 shows the operating concept of the Energy Management System (EMS) for a smart grid consisting of renewable energy facilities, including batteries. The EMS responds to electricity demand through power generation using new and renewable energy sources and controls the ability to sell surplus power in conjunction with the grid.
It also controls the surplus power and deficit in the smart grid using the charging/discharging flexibility of the battery.
Energy management system of smart grid with battery energy storage system

Two power sources are considered in this study: PV and wind power. Power generation from the devices are predicted taking the effects of weather and system characteristics such as product specifications and installation details.
After selecting the installation site and determining the PV specifications, the predicted amount of PV power generation is determined by the solar radiation, surface temperature, and performance value of the PV product. Figure 5 shows the monthly cumulative power generation for 28 locations in Korea using a 295 W PV module sample unit (CS6X-295X, CanadianSolar).
Monthly cumulative PV power generation for 28 locations in Korea (CS6X-295X, CanadianSolar)

The wind power generators were selected from 4representative models (FD21-100-12, NPS100C-24, WES250, and DW-52-500) with different capacities, and the power output was calculated for 28 regions in Korea. After selecting the installation sites and determining the WT specifications, the predicted amount of wind power generation is determined by the wind velocity, air temperature, and the air density value at the wind farm. Figure 6 shows the monthly cumulative power generation for 28 regions in Korea using one of a 100 kW wind turbine sample unit (FD21-100-12, GHREPOWER).
Monthly cumulative wind power generation for 28 locations in Korea (FD21-100-12, GHREPOWER)

To analyse the performance and economic efficiency of renewable energy facilities, the calculation results must first be verified for each module, and an integration module is needed to evaluate the results. First, the calculation process of each module was performed, and the result was compared with a standard model or a physical solution. The reliability of the developed software program was confirmed by the calculation results of renewable power generation and a sensitivity analysis for the specific region case in Korea. The following are the results from the case study.
The developed software models were compared to verify the results of the commercial programs TRNSYS and HOMER. In the case of the PV model, the amount of power generation was predicted well based on the difference of the PV module type and the amount of solar radiation by the region. In addition, the error of the annual cumulative power generation with the target program is less than 1%. However, larger error occurs in the calculation of the power generation of TRNSYS and HOMER. In both regions, the maximum error of the cumulative annual power generation was about 47%. Figures 7 and 8 compare the calculation results and measured data from PV power plants in near the target location. As shown in Figure 8, the monthly cumulative errors were 97.8% and 75.4%, respectively. The calculation error could have occurred due to the use of different weather data in the actual PV power measurement conditions. Therefore, in future work, it is necessary to calibrate the prediction error by measuring the solar power generation together with the meteorological information, including the amount of solar radiation, and to compare the calculated results.
Monthly cumulative PV power generation from two different locations: (Gangneung and Gangjin) CS6X-295P (a) and LG250S9W-M3 (b)

Verification of calculation results and measurement data from PV farm (CS6X-295P)

Figure 9 shows the results of comparing the differences in the amount of generation by product using the wind power generator calculation model. The error between the target programs is very good at 0.6%. The results are also in agreement with the calculated value of power generation by TRNSYS and HOMER.
Monthly cumulative wind power generation for 2 regions in Korea (FD21-100-12 and NP100-24)

The electrical power load of a plant in a specific region was selected and analysed as shown in Figure 10. The optimum investment design condition of the renewable energy system for cost reduction through peak load reduction was calculated. The operation capacity of the renewable energy facilities was changed step by step, an operation simulation was carried out, and the results were verified. Figure 11 shows the summary results of the economic evaluation for various capacity conditions. In the sensitivity analysis, the NPV and the PP gradually increase with the total capacity and the IRR decreases. The optimum PP for the entire capacity range was 22 MW of facility investment. However, the ESS capacity was significantly influenced by the NPV compared to the FC.
Electrical power load data from the grid-connected factory case study

Economic evaluation results of the sensitivity case study

In the calculation of the optimal design conditions for each load, the optimal capacity condition was calculated to minimize the recovery period and maximize the economic efficiency based on the NPV. There were optimal conditions of the investment payback period in the boundary area, and the optimal facility capacity and PP were calculated for each device under the optimum conditions of NPV. However, the sensitivity analysis shows that the investment effect depends on the total facility capacity, and the initial input conditions must be selected well based on the input conditions for economic analysis.
Power supply from renewable energy sources is increasing rapidly around the world, which is causing instability in the power grid system. It is necessary to study the optimum facility capacity design conditions, including economic efficiency analysis based on energy production, initial investment cost, and operating cost. It is valuable to obtain the optimum capacity of the renewable energy supply system that is most suitable for the specified load characteristics.
The engineering economic evaluation software KePOP was developed to find an optimum design for renewable energy systems in smart micro-grid, off-grid, and on-grid cases. The software was used to calculate the renewable energy production from PV and WT in local regions in Korea. TMY2 files were made for the renewable energy calculation based on meteorological data from 28 locations in Korea. To calculate the output of the PV and WT, a simple power generation models based on theoretical equations have been applied. Fuel cells and diesel engine generators can be selected as a base power source model, and a battery energy storage device was included for efficient energy management system. The models were compared with commercial programs such as TRNSYS and HOMER. In the case of the PV model, the amount of power generation was predicted well based on the differences in the amount of solar radiation by region. In addition, the error of the annual cumulative power generation with the target program was less than 1%. In the wind power calculation, the error between the target programs was very good at 0.6%. The results of the device model verification were in good agreement with the results under the same conditions.
Sensitivity analysis for the grid-connected factory case was performed and the optimum investment design condition of the renewable energy system for cost reduction through peak load reduction was calculated. The optimum PP for the entire capacity range was 22 MW of facility investment. It is necessary to improve the accuracy of the individual models by verifying the data with data from a demonstration complex. The developed program can provide useful information for investment decisions through the optimal design of facility capacity and economic analysis when investing in renewable energy facilities.
Stacking Value with Virtual Power Plants in today’s Digital Power Grid – Moving distributed networked Energy into the Mainstream ,Navigant Research White Study , 2017
, Future Electricity Market Structure to ensure large Volume of RES ,European Energy Market (EEM), 14th International Conference, IEEE , 1-62017, https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2017.7981972
, Institutional challenges caused by the integration of Renewable Energy Sources in the European Electricity Sector ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 75 , :660-6672017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.039
, Review of Software Tools for Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 32 , :192-2052014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.035
, A review of Computer Tools for analysing the integration of Renewable Energy into various Energy Systems ,Applied Energy , Vol. 87 (4), :1059-10822010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.09.026
, On the planning and analysis of integrated Community Energy Systems: A review and survey of available Tools ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 15 (9), :4836-48542011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.067
, Survey of Software Tools for Energy efficiency in a Community ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 15 (9), :4897-49032011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.06.014
, A Renewable Energy System for a nearly Zero Greenhouse City: Case Study of a small City in Southern Italy ,Energy , Vol. 143 , :347-3622018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.004
, Performance analysis of a small Capacity compressed Air Energy Storage System for Renewable Energy Generation using TRNSYS ,Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy , Vol. 9 (4), :0441062017, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5000287
, Comparative Performance analysis of a Hybrid PV/FC/battery stand-alone System using different Power management Strategies and sizing approaches ,International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , Vol. 40 (1), :538-5482015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.10.097
, Alternative Energy Scenarios for Bozcaada Island, Turkey ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 45 , :468-4802015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.001
, Assessment of Economic viability for PV/wind/diesel Hybrid Energy System in Southern Peninsular Malaysia ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 16 (1), :634-6472012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.028
, Techno-economic evaluation of various Hybrid Power Systems for Rural Telecom ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 43 , :553-5612015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.103
, Analysis of change in Electric Energy cost with using Renewable Energy Sources in Gökceada, Turkey: An Island Example ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 14 (1), :323-3332010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.030
, Techno-economic analysis of stand-alone Hybrid Photovoltaic-diesel-battery Systems for Rural electrification in eastern part of Iran ‒ A Step toward sustainable Rural development ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 28 , :456-4622013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.011
, Economic evaluation of Hybrid renewable Energy Systems for Rural electrification in Iran — A Case Study ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 16 (5), :3123-31302012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.052
, Off-grid Electricity Generation with renewable Energy Technologies in India: An Application of HOMER ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 62 , :388-3982014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.07.028
, Economic analysis of PV/diesel Hybrid System with Flywheel Energy Storage ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 78 , :398-4052015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.026
, Sedraoui, K. and Twaha, S., Optimal sizing of Grid-connected Photovoltaic Energy System in Saudi Arabia ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 75 , :489-4952015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.10.028
, Review of Economic assessment of Hybrid Photovoltaic-diesel-battery Power Systems for Residential loads for different Provinces of Saudi Arabia ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 31 , :174-1812014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.055
, Optimal Green Energy management in Jeju, South Korea-On-Grid and Off-Grid electrification ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 69 , :123-1332014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.004
, Feasibility Study for a Standalone Solar-wind-based Hybrid Energy System for application in Ethiopia ,Applied Energy , Vol. 87 (2), :487-4952010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.06.006
, A feasibility Study of a Stand-alone Hybrid Solar-wind-battery System for a Remote Island ,Applied Energy , Vol. 121 , :149-1582014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.090
, Distributed Generation in an isolated Grid: Methodology of Case Study for Lesvos-Greece ,Applied Energy , Vol. 88 (7), :2530-25402011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.01.046
, Analysis of Off-grid Electricity System at Isle of Eigg (Scotland): Lessons for developing Countries ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 81 , :578-5882015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.03.061
, Optimal planning and design of a Renewable Energy based Supply System for Microgrids ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 45 , :7-152012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.01.087
, Feasibility Study of Renewable Energy-based Microgrid System in Somaliland’s Urban Centers ,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , Vol. 40 , :1048-10592014, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.150
, Feasibility Study of Wind-to-hydrogen System for Arctic remote Locations – Grimsey Island Case Study ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 76 , :204-2112015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.11.023
, Cost-benefit analysis of Grid-connected Wind-biogas Hybrid Energy production, by Turbine Capacity and Site ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 80 , :573-5822015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.02.055
, Blockchain based decentralized management of demand response Programs in Smart Energy Grids ,Sensors , Vol. 18 (1), :1-212018, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18010162
, An Energy Box in a Cloud-based Architecture for autonomous demand response of Prosumers and Prosumages ,Electronics , Vol. 6 (4), :1-162017, https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics6040098
, Gonzalez-Romera, E., A Smart Power Electronic Multiconverter for the Residential Sector ,Sensors , Vol. 17 (6), :1-162017
, Overgrid: A fully distributed demand response Architecture based on Overlay Networks ,IEEE Trans. on Automation Science and Engineering , Vol. 14 (2), :471-4812017, https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2016.2621890
, Multiobjective automated and autonomous intelligent load Control for Smart Buildings ,IEEE Trans. on Power Systems , Vol. 33 (3), :2778-27912018, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2017.2756660
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
, - ,
TRNSYS 17 – Mathematical Reference , 2014 Comprehensive approach to modeling and simulation of Photovoltaic Arrays ,IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics , Vol. 24 (5), :1198-12082009, https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2009.2013862
, An extension of the Screws Beam Theory (in German) ,Z. Flugtech Mot. Luftschiffahrt (ZFM) , Vol. 11 , :105-1101920
, - , Wind Energy Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, 2011
A Statistical analysis of Wind Power density based on the Weibull and Rayleigh Models at the Southern Region of Turkey ,Renewable Energy , Vol. 29 (4), :593-6042004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2003.07.002
, Assessment of Diesel use in Remote Area Power Supply, Internal Report prepared for the Australian Greenhouse Office ,Energy Strategies , 1999
, Experimental validation of a Battery dynamic Model for EV Applications ,World Electric Vehicle Journal , Vol. 3 (1), :1-102009, https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj3020289
, Lead Acid Battery Storage Model for Hybrid Energy Systems ,Solar Energy , Vol. 50 (5), 1993, https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(93)90060-2
, Design of Primary and Secondary Cells II, An Equation describing Battery discharge ,Journal of Electrochemical Society , Vol. 112 (7), :657-6641965, https://doi.org/10.1149/1.2423659
, Phenomenological Cell modelling: A Tool for planning and analyzing Battery testing at the BEST Facility, Report RD77-1 ,Public Service Electric and Gas Company & PSE & G Research Corporation , 1977
, Real-Time dynamic simulation of Korean Power Grid for Frequency regulation Control by MW Battery Energy Storage System ,Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems , Vol. 4 (4), :392-4072016, https://doi.org/10.13044/j.sdewes.2016.04.0030
,